DC’s latest attempt to expand their cinematic universe with Supergirl has gone down like a damp squib with critics, as they labelled the film ‘ugly’ and ‘flat’ in a string of lacklustre reviews.After building excitement with her brief cameo in last year’s Superman, Milly Alcock’s take on the famous heroine earned a mixed reception, with one critic even calling the film ‘a dispiriting girl power disappointment.’Milly has been the target of relentless backlash since she was cast in the flick and has been on the receiving end of harsh comments about her appearance.The film sees Kara Zor-El ‘join forces with an unlikely companion for an interstellar journey of vengeance and justice,’ to track down an antidote after her beloved dog Krypton is poisoned.For many critics, Milly’s performance as Kara Zor-El was one of the few positives in the film, despite her character being called a ‘Gen-Z malcontent’ in stark contrast to her squeaky clean male counterpart.Writing a two-star review for The Independent, Clarisse Loughrey said: ‘While Nogueira’s script adapts Tom King and Bilquis Evely’s 2021 comic miniseries Woman of Tomorrow, Gillespie doesn’t carry over any of its striking and beautiful cosmic imagery – instead, we’re stuck in a colourless, utilitarian version of Gunn’s own Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy. DC’s latest attempt to expand their cinematic universe with Supergirl has gone down like a damp squib with critics, as they called the film ‘ugly’ and ‘flat’ in a string of lacklustre reviews’It’s cramped and dingy, with only an occasional bit of fun puppet or prosthetic alien work to break up the monotony.’Kevin Maher in The Times gave the film two stars, and made reference to Milly’s modern take on Supergirl by calling her a ‘Gen-Z malcontent.’He wrote: ‘The film is perforated with needless and momentum-killing flashbacks that describe Kara’s journey to Earth. We don’t care! She’s on Earth! That’s enough! ‘And Corenswet pops up a handful of times, still interesting as a character, still searching for a better superhero film. Good luck with that.’Awarded the film three stars, Peter Bradshaw wrote in The Guardian: ‘Supergirl isn’t a perfect movie by any means, but there are moments when you’ll believe this franchise can fly.’The Irish Times’ Craig Gillespie gave the film two stars, writing: ‘The infuriating thing about this overpriced movie is that the film-makers come close to solving the problem of Supergirl. ‘Subject of a terrible 1984 film and a decent 2015 TV series, the character has had trouble making distinct sense on screen. Alcock’s swaggering layabout – who doesn’t always close the door when going to the loo – reclaims her as an alien with enjoyably human flaws.’The bad news is that, as you have almost certainly guessed, she will be required to pull herself together in what used to be the final reel. Not fair. No fun. Give us back the hungover barfly.’Owen Gleiberman wrote in Variety: ‘It’s all so desperate to be ”punk rock.” But Supergirl is a punk crock.’ Milly Alcock’s take on the famous heroine earned a mixed reception, with one critic even calling the film ‘a dispiriting girl power disappointment’Pete Hammond wrote in Deadline: ‘The special effects and relentlessly dark tone often get in the way of making this group rock despite the best efforts of Alcock who is a bit too quirky, playing Zor-El as somewhat reckless, headstrong, and not always put together.’ In The Hollywood Reporter, David Rooney said: ‘Given Australian director Gillespie’s history with films about spirited, rule-breaking women, like I, Tonya and Cruella, the failure to find emotional depth in the sisterhood of Kara and Ruthye is notable.’David Fear was more complimentary, writing in Rolling Stone: ‘No one thought Superman was a fluke. ‘But if Gunn and Co. can keep maintaining this kind of quality and respect for the DC stable of side characters while digging into deeper, thornier terrain like this, and still adding an element of fun, this whole 2.0 era might actually make you believe a franchise reset can fly.’In Vulture, Alison Willmore said: ‘Alcock, with her smirk and her anguished eyes, is a very watchable lead, but this aggressively minor movie doesn’t know what to do with her or her character. ‘And where’s the mystery in that? Supergirl, she’s just like us — running away from her problems (albeit all the way to other galaxies) and overinvesting in her beloved dog.’The Sun’s Dulcie Pearce was full of praise for the film, awarding it four stars.She wrote: ‘A large section of the film gives Supergirl’s backstory, which makes things a little too chaotic and a tad exhausting.’But with a few comedic appearances from Superman (David Corenswet), an excellent soundtrack and enough jeopardy to keep you intrigued, this film is off to a flier.’Alongside a mixed reaction from critics, Milly has also faced a furore over her looks after she was cast as the lead in the DC Studios remake.The drama began when Lois and Clark star Dean Cain faced backlash from Superman fans after seemingly mocking Alcock’s appearance on social media.The conservative actor, 59, came under fire after responding to a meme that likened her to the primitive, ape-like human Cha-ka from the 1974 series Land of the Lost.A troll responded to Cain on X with an unflattering photo of Cha-ka and asked, ‘And why does she look like this guy?’Cain then responded, ‘Dang it… I laughed,’ followed by a smiling emoji.The actor’s reaction to the cruel comparison quickly spread on social media, leaving a number of superhero fans outraged. ‘What a fantastic way to kill your legacy. And what a glorious way to lose the respect of millions of kids that looked up to you three decades ago. What a disgrace,’ wrote one person.Another commented: ‘Your Superman performance is never going to be looked back upon fondly, your bitter jealousy has tainted any legacy you had left.’ Cain eventually clarified that he ‘never said she was ugly’, but seemed overall unconcerned by the backlash.The American actor is best known for playing Superman in the ’90s TV series Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman.Alcock later issued a defiant response in the face of backlash over her casting in the iconic role. The Sydney-born actress told Variety Magazine that she was ignoring the criticism. ‘[The criticism] is from a lot of people whose profiles have no photo, who are burner accounts, or someone’s name and then “Dad of four, Christian,” which is hilarious to me,’ she said.’I mean, whose opinion do you really care about? If you’re p***ing the right kind of people off, you’re doing okay!’ Supergirl: What the critics think The Independent, Clarisse LoughreyRating:’While Nogueira’s script adapts Tom King and Bilquis Evely’s 2021 comic miniseries Woman of Tomorrow, Gillespie doesn’t carry over any of its striking and beautiful cosmic imagery – instead, we’re stuck in a colourless, utilitarian version of Gunn’s own Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy.’It’s cramped and dingy, with only an occasional bit of fun puppet or prosthetic alien work to break up the monotony.’The Times, Kevin MaherRating:’The film is perforated with needless and momentum-killing flashbacks that describe Kara’s journey to Earth. We don’t care! She’s on Earth! That’s enough!’And Corenswet pops up a handful of times, still interesting as a character, still searching for a better superhero film. Good luck with that.’The Guardian, Peter BradshawRating:’Supergirl isn’t a perfect movie by any means, but there are moments when you’ll believe this franchise can fly.’The Irish Times, Craig GillespieRating:’The infuriating thing about this overpriced movie is that the film-makers come close to solving the problem of Supergirl. ‘Subject of a terrible 1984 film and a decent 2015 TV series, the character has had trouble making distinct sense on screen. Alcock’s swaggering layabout – who doesn’t always close the door when going to the loo – reclaims her as an alien with enjoyably human flaws.’The bad news is that, as you have almost certainly guessed, she will be required to pull herself together in what used to be the final reel. Not fair. No fun. Give us back the hungover barfly.’Variety, Owen Gleiberman’It’s all so desperate to be ”punk rock.” But Supergirl is a punk crock’Deadline, Pete Hammond’The special effects and relentlessly dark tone often get in the way of making this group rock despite the best efforts of Alcock who is a bit too quirky, playing Zor-El as somewhat reckless, headstrong, and not always put together.’The Hollywood Reporter, David Rooney’Given Australian director Gillespie’s history with films about spirited, rule-breaking women, like I, Tonya and Cruella, the failure to find emotional depth in the sisterhood of Kara and Ruthye is notable.’Vulture, Alison Willmore’Alcock, with her smirk and her anguished eyes, is a very watchable lead, but this aggressively minor movie doesn’t know what to do with her or her character. ‘And where’s the mystery in that? Supergirl, she’s just like us — running away from her problems (albeit all the way to other galaxies) and overinvesting in her beloved dog.’The Sun, Dulcie PearceRating:’A large section of the film gives Supergirl’s backstory, which makes things a little too chaotic and a tad exhausting.’But with a few comedic appearances from Superman (David Corenswet), an excellent soundtrack and enough jeopardy to keep you intrigued, this film is off to a flier.’